Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of the subjects, strategies, performance changes and PEDro scores of the included studies

From: Performance effects of periodized carbohydrate restriction in endurance trained athletes – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Subjects

VO2max (ml·kg− 1·min− 1)

”Train-low” strategy

Changes in endurance performance

PEDro score

Yeo et al. 2008 [40]

14 male cyclists

Low: n = 7

High: n = 7

Low: 60

High: 61

”Twice-a-day” every second day vs. “Once-a-day” every day

6 sessions (3 AT and 3 HIIT) per week for 3 weeks

HIIT commenced with low vs. high muscle glycogen

Athletes instructed to consume of 8-9 g CHO ·kg− 1·day− 1 throughout the period

Total training volume: 7 h·week− 1

Low = High

60 min preload + 60 min TT

10–12% increase in PO during TT in both groups (P < 0.01)

5

Hulston et al. 2010 [41]

14 male cyclists

Low: n = 7

High: n = 7

Low: 65

High: 66

”Twice-a-day” every second day vs. “Once-a-day” every day

6 sessions (3 AT and 3 HIIT) per week for 3 weeks

HIIT commenced with low vs. high CHO availability

Athletes instructed to consume high CHO diet throughout the period

Total training volume: 7.5 h·week− 1

Low = High

60 min preload + 1017 ± 73 kJ TT

10–11% increase in PO during TT in both groups (P < 0.001)

6

Cox et al.

2010 [42]

16 male triathletes

Low: n = 8

High: n = 8

Groups combined:

65

“Fasted training” vs. training with high CHO availability

6 sessions per week for 23 days

5 g CHO·kg− 1·day− 1 in both groups

High: +  1.5 g CHO·kg− 1·day− 1 for every hour of exercise

Low: +  25 kJ·kg− 1·day− 1 for every hour of exercise from fat and protein

Low: fasting for 2 h prior to and during all sessions

High: ingestion of CHO before or during all sessions

Low = High

100 min preload + 7 kJ/kg TT

4–6% reduced time in TT in both groups (P < 0.01)

6

Marquet et al. 2016 [43]

21 male triathletes

Low: n = 11

High: n = 10

Low: 60

High: 60

”Sleep-low”

3x CHO periodization per week for 3 weeks

Identical diets in both groups but different timing

0 g vs. 5 g CHO·kg− 1 during and between afternoon and morning sessions

Additional AT sessions in both groups

Total training volume: 10-15 h·week− 1

Low > High

40 km bike preload + 10 km run

− 2.9% run time in Low (P < 0.01)

− 0.1% run time in High (ns)

6

Marquet et al. 2016 [44]

21 male cyclists

Low: n = 12

High: n = 9

Groups combined:

64

”Sleep-low”

3x per week for 1 week

Identical diets in Low and High around “train-low” sessions but different timing

0 vs. 5 g CHO·kg− 1 between afternoon HIIT and morning AT.

Total training volume: 5 h during the 6-day training period.

Low > High

120 min preload + 20 km TT

− 3% TT time in Low (P < 0.05)

− 1% TT time in High (ns)

6

Burke et al. 2017 [6]

19 male elite race walkers

Low: n = 10

High: n = 9

Low: 65

High: 62

“Fasted training”, “Sleep-low” and “Twice-a-day”

Alternating strategies 6 days per week for 3 weeks

Identical energy and CHO intake low and high but different timing.

Average total training volume: Low: 125 km·week− 1; High: 117 km·week− 1

Low = High

10 km race walking

5–7% reduced walking time in both groups (P < 0.01)

5

Gejl et al. 2017 [45]

26 male triathletes and cyclists

Low: n = 13

High: n = 13

Low: 65

High: 65

”Twice-a-day”

6 sessions (3 HIT and 3 AT) per week for 4 weeks

1 g vs. 6 g CHO · kg− 1 between HIT and LIT sessions (isocaloric diets)

Additional AT sessions to attain habitual training volume

Average total training volume in matched pairs of athletes: 16 h·week− 1

Low = High

90 min preload + 30 min TT

5–6% increase in PO during TT in both groups (P = 0.0003)

6

Riis et al. 2019 [46]

13 male endurance athletes

Low: n = 6

High: n = 7

Low: 63

High: 65

”Sleep-low”

6 sessions (3 HIT and 3 AT) per week for 4 weeks

Identical diets but different timing.

0 vs. 3.6 g CHO·kg− 1 between afternoon HIIT and morning AT

Total training volume: 6hrs45min·week− 1

Low = High

90 min preload + 30 min TT

14–19% increase in PO during TT in both groups (P = 0.005)

7

Burke et al. 2020 [8]

16 elite race walkers

Low:

n = 5 males

n = 3 females

High:

n = 5 males

n = 3 females

Low: 59

High: 58

“Fasted training”, “Sleep-low” and “Twice-a-day”

Alternating strategies 6 days per week for 25 days

Identical energy intake in Low and High but different timing

Average total training volume: 113 and 106 km·week− 1 in Low and High.

Low = High

10 km race walk

− 2.2% walk time in Low (P = 0.09)

− 4.8% walk time in High (P < 0.001)

5

  1. AT moderate-to-high intensity aerobic training, CHO carbohydrate, High control group receiving CHO, HIIT high intensity interval training, LIT low intensity training session, Low “train-low” group exposed to periodized fasting or CHO restriction, MAP maximal aerobic power, PO power output, TT cycling time trial, VO2max maximal oxygen consumption